Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Additional Sources

Bernstein, Mark W., and Yadin Kaufmann. How to Survive Your Freshman Year. Atlanta: Hundreds of Heads, 2004. Print.

Brady, Jonann. "Binge Drinking Entrenched in College Culture." ABC News. ABCNEWS.com, 7 Sept. 2005. Web. 29 Apr. 2011.

Brown, Nathan. The Pocket Idiot's Guide to Surviving College. Indianapolis, IN: Alpha, 2004. Print.

Harrison, Harry H. 1001 Things Every College Student Needs to Know (like Buying Your Books before Exams Start). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2008. Print.

Hossler, Schmit, and Nigel Vesper. "Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make." J.H. University Press. John Hopkins University Press, 1999. Web. 3 May 2011.

Karo, Aaron. Ruminations on College Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002. Print.

Lynn, Kelci. "College Finals - A Student's Guide to Surviving College Finals." About.com. About.com, 2011. Web. 08 May 2011.

McClafferty, Karen A., Patricia M. McDonough, and Anne-Marie Nuñez. What Is a College Culture? Facilitating College Preparation through Organizational Change. University of California, Los Angeles., 1 Apr. 2002. Web. 28 Apr. 2011.

McClellan, George S. "Online Social Networking on Campus: Understanding What Matters in Student Culture." Journal of College Student Development 50.4 (2009): 468-69. Google Scholar. Web. 6 May 2011.

Suzette, Tyler. Been There, Should've Done That: 995 Tips for Making the Most of College. Lansing, MI: Front Porch, 2008. Print.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Blurb

Veteran anthropologist Rebekah Nathan goes undercover in this eye opening portrayal of college life. As a fifty-year old  former professor at her current college, she boxes away her MD and begins living as a student among freshmen in the dorms. She strives to understand her students’ irrational behaviors, such as eating in class and not participating in discussions, by immersing herself directly into the freshman culture. Nathan leaves the realm of planning lectures and creating exams, and enters the world of late night study sessions and the pressures of building a perfect résumé. Nathan’s discoveries, published in My Freshman Year, are worthwhile and provide valuable insight on college culture to both students and professors. 

Friday, May 13, 2011

My Freshman Year: Journal 4


            After reading Laura Session Stepp’s excerpt from the book Unhooked and Rebekah Nathan’s My Freshman Year, we see several differences and similarities between the two authors’ opinions of American college culture.   One main difference between these two texts is the way the authors view today’s generation of freshman students.  Stepp describes our generation as “team oriented, achievement driven, and polite” (20).  On the other hand, Nathan describes college freshman with characteristics of “Individualism” and “independence” when it came to relationships between students, involvement on campus, and future ambitions.
            A similarity between the two texts is the way in which each author views the interactions between students and their parents.  When Nathan conducted interviews of foreign exchange students, one of her questions was about American students’ contact with their parents weekly.  A Mexican exchange student observed that her American peers didn’t talk to their parents as much as she did per week: “My roommates call their dads and moms maybe once a week, and that’s it.  It would be different if they were Mexican” (73).   This observation of American students furthers Nathan’s conclusion that they are individualistic. Stepp echoes this concept by saying if parents were more involved in their college-aged children; those children would “drink less often, start dating later, and begin sex later” (45).  As American college freshman, we agree with these observations; if parents were more connected to their adult children, then the morals of those children might align closer to those of their parents. 

            In addition to characteristics of American culture and the relationships between students and their parents, another interesting aspect is the influence of the media in college students’ lives. Nathan analyzed this media influence mainly by recording images and decorations on the fronts of students’ dorm room doors.  The images seen on the doors were consistently images of “TV or film celebrities, models from ads, and anonymous sexy young men and women” (26).  The media heavily influenced what students chose to post on the front of their own personal space that was open for the dorm to see.  Nathan continues saying “the images of ‘real’ people—that is, photographs of the resident and people the resident knew—appeared on several doors, though less frequently than media images” (26).  The media directly influences students according to Stepp, also: “Sexuality and sex have been part of the media sea in which kids have been swimming since 1970s, and the amount of sexual imagery has undeniably increased” (48). 
The media plays a dominant role in shaping students perceptions of what is normal and what is not.  This idea directly relates to the television shows that are popular in our day today, mainly those shown on MTV, for example Skins, Teen Mom, 16 and Pregnant, The Secret Life of the American Teenager, and The Hard Times of R.J. Berger.  All of these shows are highly sexual and promote somewhat irresponsible lifestyles, such as girls getting pregnant at the age of sixteen (16 and Pregnant) or a group of friends in high school binge drinking every weekend (Skins).  We feel that we are affected by the media through these shows; if drinking, partying, and sexual behaviors are broadcasted on television, we feel that those activities have become the social norm for our generations, and we feel disconnected from our peers if we are not participating in these activities.

Overview Discussion Leader Liz Diede


1.     Do you think Nathan’s overall findings accurately describe the undergraduate culture? What areas of her results do not represent the characteristics of a freshman college student based on your own first year experience?

We feel that Nathan thoroughly researched the culture of undergraduates and that the majority of her findings are accurate. Her observations of the decorations of dorm room doors closely aligned with what the members of our group have noticed on many of the doors of other freshmen students. Pictures and whiteboards are very common on the doors in female halls, as Nathan described in chapter 2. However, we believe that Nathan unfairly judged the students in these halls based on what she saw on their doors. We agree that the subject matter and type of objects that are placed on the outside of a door is not representative of a person’s personality or lifestyle necessarily, although it can be an indication of what type of person that individual is. We decided that it would have been beneficial for Nathan to ask permission to enter the rooms of the individuals of the doors that she observed and interview them and also observe the type of decoration that is displayed on the inside of the room. What is placed inside a room rather than on the outside of the door can vary drastically, and it is not fair of Nathan to make assumptions about these college freshmen.

2.     What type of research was effective in observing the undergraduate culture?
What other techniques could Nathan have used to gain a more realistic understanding of the culture she was studying?

While studying college freshmen, Nathan often observes the behavior of these students while also incorporating interviews into her study. An example of the observations that she does would be when she sat in the cafeteria to determine which racial groups sit together and converse during their lunch hour. We feel that this would be the most effective way to gather information of a very large population such as the people in a campus cafeteria. Her interviews we feel were effective to an extent, however she seemed to interview many more international students compared to the number of non-international students. These interviews made her results seem biased and very judgmental of the American campus culture. We think that another way that Nathan could have successfully gathered information would be to send out a survey to the entire campus via e-mail to get more widespread responses from people of different cultures, interests, majors, and hobbies. We feel that this would make her results seem less one-sided.

3.     Who do you think Nathan’s published findings are directed towards?

We feel that the cover is very obviously directed toward a college-aged student, since the words are highlighted and are in bright colors such as orange and yellow. However, we think that some of the chapters in the book seem to be directed more towards professors at universities such as AnyU. In chapter 7, Nathan describes everything that she learned from her experiences as a freshman, and discusses the behaviors of students that would be beneficial for professors to understand. Some examples would be the realization of what types of assignments students are less likely to do and understanding why some students may eat or seem inattentive during a lecture. Another reason that we feel this book may be published for professors to read is because Nathan describes the changes that she made to her own class syllabus to make it more flexible and student-oriented, we feel that this was a way to get other professors to understand the reasons why many students don’t show up for class or during any office hours.

4.     What types of students that Nathan failed to address in her study of
undergraduate freshmen?

Although Nathan included international students and students of many different clubs and organizations on campus in her study, we feel that she left out some groups of people in her overall study. Nathan did not consider non-traditional students in her research, she only mentioned students who were between the ages of 18 and 20. We feel that this is a large population that she left out, because we have noticed a lot of older, non-traditional students on campus at Eau Claire that could also be considered as freshmen. Also, Nathan did not address students who commute from home to class. These students, living off campus, miss out on the dorm and cafeteria experience and may have a whole different perspective on life as a freshman. We think that Nathan might have chosen to not include these two groups of people because they are outliers in the study, and the majority of undergraduate students are between the ages of 18 and 20 and they often do choose to live on campus. 

Overview Summarizer Clare Koopmans


Chapter One:
In the first chapter, Nathan focuses on the topic of integration into college culture.  She develops her plan to go incognito and attend the same university where she was a professor and live with college students.  She displays integration by explaining how hard it was for her to become accustomed to walking to class instead of driving, learning about alcohol consumption rules in the dorms, adjusting to the speed and lingo of college student conversations, being mistaken for a mom multiple times during orientation week and throughout the school year, and learning the university bus system.
Chapter Two:
In the second chapter, Nathan analyzed dormitory lifestyle. She carefully evaluated the images within the dorms put up by Resident assistants or by students themselves.  RAs usually place positive bulletin boards up in hallways with uplifting and informative messages about how to study for finals or how to protect oneself from excessive drinking.   Nathan took special time to decode the decorations on the doors of residents; she looked at decorations only on the outside of doors, and found that common themes were “drinking, smoking, dugs, and sexuality” (25).  She also observed how resident meetings scheduled by RAs attracted high attendance for the first meeting, but were disregarded by residents for the rest of the year. Nathan next profiled several freshmen, asking them about their daily activities and activeness in on-campus clubs.
Chapter Three:
The third chapter focuses on community and diversity. Nathan observes when college community means, and she found that communities are created when students have similar schedules including class schedule, on-campus clubs, meal times, and work schedules—not necessarily created by living in the same dorm.  Nathan next investigates diversity at her university and how it affects the formation of communities at AnyU.  She discovered that when students were asked if they had racially diverse friends, the majority answered yes, but when they were asked to name their closest friends first, then name the race of the already named friends, the majority of the responses showed that the closest friends were of the same race.  Nathan observed diversity in the cafeteria, too, noting that certain groups of race stayed together while eating.
Chapter Four:
In the fourth chapter, Nathan focuses on how others cultures perceive our American college culture.  She interviews foreign exchange students on the topics of friendships between them and American students.  Exchange students noted that American students always pretended to be their friends, and would always say hello, but according to the exchange students, American students seems as though they didn’t care as much about their lives.  The exchange students found it hard to tell if an American was actually their friend or was making false suggestions that they should hang out sometime. International students classified American college students by using the terms “individualism” and “independence” (73).  The exchange students said that the culture was different in terms of family communication, for instance a student from Mexico commented that she calls her mother everyday, while American students tend to only call their parents once a week.   Finally, Nathan interviewed the exchange students on the American education system in comparison to their home educational systems.  The majority stated that Americans have much more freedom to take the classes that they want, and an even distribution of opinions stated the education system in American was either easier or harder than the interviewed students home education.
Chapter Five:
In the fifth chapter, Nathan explores the proper way of speaking in American college culture: the social norms for asking questions in class, having contact with professors, and speaking amongst friends and dorm mates.  Social norms for classroom discussion were to ask questions in a lecture hall only if the questions addressed issues that would affect students’ grades such as “What will be the form of exams,” “Are the quizzes on the internet?” and “Do you want the first essay typed?” Social norms for contact between students a professors varied; some students admitted to trying to talk with professors in order to establish a relationship and others admitted that they had not spoken to their professors once all year.  Social norms for conversation topics between students themselves and dorm mates stayed to the topics of “bodies, bodily functions, body image, relationships, relationship problems, one’s childhood, personal history, the future, alcohol, and drug experiences’ (98).
Chapter Six:
Chapter six focused on time management in college, including how to create the perfect class schedule, limiting workloads, attending class, and cheating.  Creating the perfect class schedule included signing up for classes with good professors, trying not to get classes on Friday, and trying to avoid classes before 11am. Limited workloads are encouraged in American college culture. This might include decisions between reading an article or attending a club meeting or attending class if the professor doesn’t take attendance or going out with friends.  81 percent of students had admitted to cheating in some way during college, and Nathan investigates on whether or not students care about cheating.  She also asks if they would continue college if they were handed a degree today, and most students answered that they would remain in school.
Chapter Seven:
Chapter seven was a reflection of the lessons that Nathan had learned during her time undercover.   The most important lesson that she learned was compassion for the students who she had been teaching and never took the chance to know.  She talked about her ideas on improving her teaching style to accommodate student life when she returns to her teaching position.  She also confesses the times that she revealed herself as a professor while working in the field when it was absolutely necessary.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Overview Graphic Organizer Sam S.


The College Experience
Students, when first experiencing the world of college life, are often taken back by all the change and adjustment they now need to incorporate into their busy lives.  When imagining the ideal college experience, one often imagines a balanced scene; for example, balancing academics, activities, socialization, culture, diversity, and fun!  In Rebekah Nathan’s book My Freshman Year she encounters a number of categories college freshman are exposed to, listed above in the graphic organizer.  These categories above sum up all the experiences Nathan was exposed to in her year as a college freshman. 

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Overview Vocab Builder Derek N.

Hossler, Schmit, and Nigel Vesper. "Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make." J.H. University Press. John Hopkins University Press, 1999. Web. 3 May 2011.

Ostentatiously(Pg. 2)- Characterized by or given to pretentious or conspicuous show in an attempt to impress others.
Inextricably(Pg. 3)- Incapable of being disentangled, undone, loosed, or solved
Myriad(Pg. 4)- A very great or indefinitely great number of persons or things.
Methodological(Pg. 6)- A set or system of methods, principles, and rules for regulating a given discipline, as in the arts or sciences.
Mantra(Pg. 6)- A word or formula, as from the Veda, chanted or sung as an incantation or prayer.
Perspicacious(Pg. 6)- Having keen mental perception and understanding.
Lucent(Pg. 6)- Shining, translucent, glowing with light.
Repugnant(Pg. 7) - Distasteful, objectionable, or offensive: a repugnant smell.
Obstreperous(Pg 8)- Resisting control or restraint in a difficult manner.
Enervated(Pg. 8)- Deprived of vigor, force or strength.