Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Additional Sources

Bernstein, Mark W., and Yadin Kaufmann. How to Survive Your Freshman Year. Atlanta: Hundreds of Heads, 2004. Print.

Brady, Jonann. "Binge Drinking Entrenched in College Culture." ABC News. ABCNEWS.com, 7 Sept. 2005. Web. 29 Apr. 2011.

Brown, Nathan. The Pocket Idiot's Guide to Surviving College. Indianapolis, IN: Alpha, 2004. Print.

Harrison, Harry H. 1001 Things Every College Student Needs to Know (like Buying Your Books before Exams Start). Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2008. Print.

Hossler, Schmit, and Nigel Vesper. "Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make." J.H. University Press. John Hopkins University Press, 1999. Web. 3 May 2011.

Karo, Aaron. Ruminations on College Life. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002. Print.

Lynn, Kelci. "College Finals - A Student's Guide to Surviving College Finals." About.com. About.com, 2011. Web. 08 May 2011.

McClafferty, Karen A., Patricia M. McDonough, and Anne-Marie Nuñez. What Is a College Culture? Facilitating College Preparation through Organizational Change. University of California, Los Angeles., 1 Apr. 2002. Web. 28 Apr. 2011.

McClellan, George S. "Online Social Networking on Campus: Understanding What Matters in Student Culture." Journal of College Student Development 50.4 (2009): 468-69. Google Scholar. Web. 6 May 2011.

Suzette, Tyler. Been There, Should've Done That: 995 Tips for Making the Most of College. Lansing, MI: Front Porch, 2008. Print.

Tuesday, May 24, 2011

Blurb

Veteran anthropologist Rebekah Nathan goes undercover in this eye opening portrayal of college life. As a fifty-year old  former professor at her current college, she boxes away her MD and begins living as a student among freshmen in the dorms. She strives to understand her students’ irrational behaviors, such as eating in class and not participating in discussions, by immersing herself directly into the freshman culture. Nathan leaves the realm of planning lectures and creating exams, and enters the world of late night study sessions and the pressures of building a perfect résumé. Nathan’s discoveries, published in My Freshman Year, are worthwhile and provide valuable insight on college culture to both students and professors. 

Friday, May 13, 2011

My Freshman Year: Journal 4


            After reading Laura Session Stepp’s excerpt from the book Unhooked and Rebekah Nathan’s My Freshman Year, we see several differences and similarities between the two authors’ opinions of American college culture.   One main difference between these two texts is the way the authors view today’s generation of freshman students.  Stepp describes our generation as “team oriented, achievement driven, and polite” (20).  On the other hand, Nathan describes college freshman with characteristics of “Individualism” and “independence” when it came to relationships between students, involvement on campus, and future ambitions.
            A similarity between the two texts is the way in which each author views the interactions between students and their parents.  When Nathan conducted interviews of foreign exchange students, one of her questions was about American students’ contact with their parents weekly.  A Mexican exchange student observed that her American peers didn’t talk to their parents as much as she did per week: “My roommates call their dads and moms maybe once a week, and that’s it.  It would be different if they were Mexican” (73).   This observation of American students furthers Nathan’s conclusion that they are individualistic. Stepp echoes this concept by saying if parents were more involved in their college-aged children; those children would “drink less often, start dating later, and begin sex later” (45).  As American college freshman, we agree with these observations; if parents were more connected to their adult children, then the morals of those children might align closer to those of their parents. 

            In addition to characteristics of American culture and the relationships between students and their parents, another interesting aspect is the influence of the media in college students’ lives. Nathan analyzed this media influence mainly by recording images and decorations on the fronts of students’ dorm room doors.  The images seen on the doors were consistently images of “TV or film celebrities, models from ads, and anonymous sexy young men and women” (26).  The media heavily influenced what students chose to post on the front of their own personal space that was open for the dorm to see.  Nathan continues saying “the images of ‘real’ people—that is, photographs of the resident and people the resident knew—appeared on several doors, though less frequently than media images” (26).  The media directly influences students according to Stepp, also: “Sexuality and sex have been part of the media sea in which kids have been swimming since 1970s, and the amount of sexual imagery has undeniably increased” (48). 
The media plays a dominant role in shaping students perceptions of what is normal and what is not.  This idea directly relates to the television shows that are popular in our day today, mainly those shown on MTV, for example Skins, Teen Mom, 16 and Pregnant, The Secret Life of the American Teenager, and The Hard Times of R.J. Berger.  All of these shows are highly sexual and promote somewhat irresponsible lifestyles, such as girls getting pregnant at the age of sixteen (16 and Pregnant) or a group of friends in high school binge drinking every weekend (Skins).  We feel that we are affected by the media through these shows; if drinking, partying, and sexual behaviors are broadcasted on television, we feel that those activities have become the social norm for our generations, and we feel disconnected from our peers if we are not participating in these activities.

Overview Discussion Leader Liz Diede


1.     Do you think Nathan’s overall findings accurately describe the undergraduate culture? What areas of her results do not represent the characteristics of a freshman college student based on your own first year experience?

We feel that Nathan thoroughly researched the culture of undergraduates and that the majority of her findings are accurate. Her observations of the decorations of dorm room doors closely aligned with what the members of our group have noticed on many of the doors of other freshmen students. Pictures and whiteboards are very common on the doors in female halls, as Nathan described in chapter 2. However, we believe that Nathan unfairly judged the students in these halls based on what she saw on their doors. We agree that the subject matter and type of objects that are placed on the outside of a door is not representative of a person’s personality or lifestyle necessarily, although it can be an indication of what type of person that individual is. We decided that it would have been beneficial for Nathan to ask permission to enter the rooms of the individuals of the doors that she observed and interview them and also observe the type of decoration that is displayed on the inside of the room. What is placed inside a room rather than on the outside of the door can vary drastically, and it is not fair of Nathan to make assumptions about these college freshmen.

2.     What type of research was effective in observing the undergraduate culture?
What other techniques could Nathan have used to gain a more realistic understanding of the culture she was studying?

While studying college freshmen, Nathan often observes the behavior of these students while also incorporating interviews into her study. An example of the observations that she does would be when she sat in the cafeteria to determine which racial groups sit together and converse during their lunch hour. We feel that this would be the most effective way to gather information of a very large population such as the people in a campus cafeteria. Her interviews we feel were effective to an extent, however she seemed to interview many more international students compared to the number of non-international students. These interviews made her results seem biased and very judgmental of the American campus culture. We think that another way that Nathan could have successfully gathered information would be to send out a survey to the entire campus via e-mail to get more widespread responses from people of different cultures, interests, majors, and hobbies. We feel that this would make her results seem less one-sided.

3.     Who do you think Nathan’s published findings are directed towards?

We feel that the cover is very obviously directed toward a college-aged student, since the words are highlighted and are in bright colors such as orange and yellow. However, we think that some of the chapters in the book seem to be directed more towards professors at universities such as AnyU. In chapter 7, Nathan describes everything that she learned from her experiences as a freshman, and discusses the behaviors of students that would be beneficial for professors to understand. Some examples would be the realization of what types of assignments students are less likely to do and understanding why some students may eat or seem inattentive during a lecture. Another reason that we feel this book may be published for professors to read is because Nathan describes the changes that she made to her own class syllabus to make it more flexible and student-oriented, we feel that this was a way to get other professors to understand the reasons why many students don’t show up for class or during any office hours.

4.     What types of students that Nathan failed to address in her study of
undergraduate freshmen?

Although Nathan included international students and students of many different clubs and organizations on campus in her study, we feel that she left out some groups of people in her overall study. Nathan did not consider non-traditional students in her research, she only mentioned students who were between the ages of 18 and 20. We feel that this is a large population that she left out, because we have noticed a lot of older, non-traditional students on campus at Eau Claire that could also be considered as freshmen. Also, Nathan did not address students who commute from home to class. These students, living off campus, miss out on the dorm and cafeteria experience and may have a whole different perspective on life as a freshman. We think that Nathan might have chosen to not include these two groups of people because they are outliers in the study, and the majority of undergraduate students are between the ages of 18 and 20 and they often do choose to live on campus. 

Overview Summarizer Clare Koopmans


Chapter One:
In the first chapter, Nathan focuses on the topic of integration into college culture.  She develops her plan to go incognito and attend the same university where she was a professor and live with college students.  She displays integration by explaining how hard it was for her to become accustomed to walking to class instead of driving, learning about alcohol consumption rules in the dorms, adjusting to the speed and lingo of college student conversations, being mistaken for a mom multiple times during orientation week and throughout the school year, and learning the university bus system.
Chapter Two:
In the second chapter, Nathan analyzed dormitory lifestyle. She carefully evaluated the images within the dorms put up by Resident assistants or by students themselves.  RAs usually place positive bulletin boards up in hallways with uplifting and informative messages about how to study for finals or how to protect oneself from excessive drinking.   Nathan took special time to decode the decorations on the doors of residents; she looked at decorations only on the outside of doors, and found that common themes were “drinking, smoking, dugs, and sexuality” (25).  She also observed how resident meetings scheduled by RAs attracted high attendance for the first meeting, but were disregarded by residents for the rest of the year. Nathan next profiled several freshmen, asking them about their daily activities and activeness in on-campus clubs.
Chapter Three:
The third chapter focuses on community and diversity. Nathan observes when college community means, and she found that communities are created when students have similar schedules including class schedule, on-campus clubs, meal times, and work schedules—not necessarily created by living in the same dorm.  Nathan next investigates diversity at her university and how it affects the formation of communities at AnyU.  She discovered that when students were asked if they had racially diverse friends, the majority answered yes, but when they were asked to name their closest friends first, then name the race of the already named friends, the majority of the responses showed that the closest friends were of the same race.  Nathan observed diversity in the cafeteria, too, noting that certain groups of race stayed together while eating.
Chapter Four:
In the fourth chapter, Nathan focuses on how others cultures perceive our American college culture.  She interviews foreign exchange students on the topics of friendships between them and American students.  Exchange students noted that American students always pretended to be their friends, and would always say hello, but according to the exchange students, American students seems as though they didn’t care as much about their lives.  The exchange students found it hard to tell if an American was actually their friend or was making false suggestions that they should hang out sometime. International students classified American college students by using the terms “individualism” and “independence” (73).  The exchange students said that the culture was different in terms of family communication, for instance a student from Mexico commented that she calls her mother everyday, while American students tend to only call their parents once a week.   Finally, Nathan interviewed the exchange students on the American education system in comparison to their home educational systems.  The majority stated that Americans have much more freedom to take the classes that they want, and an even distribution of opinions stated the education system in American was either easier or harder than the interviewed students home education.
Chapter Five:
In the fifth chapter, Nathan explores the proper way of speaking in American college culture: the social norms for asking questions in class, having contact with professors, and speaking amongst friends and dorm mates.  Social norms for classroom discussion were to ask questions in a lecture hall only if the questions addressed issues that would affect students’ grades such as “What will be the form of exams,” “Are the quizzes on the internet?” and “Do you want the first essay typed?” Social norms for contact between students a professors varied; some students admitted to trying to talk with professors in order to establish a relationship and others admitted that they had not spoken to their professors once all year.  Social norms for conversation topics between students themselves and dorm mates stayed to the topics of “bodies, bodily functions, body image, relationships, relationship problems, one’s childhood, personal history, the future, alcohol, and drug experiences’ (98).
Chapter Six:
Chapter six focused on time management in college, including how to create the perfect class schedule, limiting workloads, attending class, and cheating.  Creating the perfect class schedule included signing up for classes with good professors, trying not to get classes on Friday, and trying to avoid classes before 11am. Limited workloads are encouraged in American college culture. This might include decisions between reading an article or attending a club meeting or attending class if the professor doesn’t take attendance or going out with friends.  81 percent of students had admitted to cheating in some way during college, and Nathan investigates on whether or not students care about cheating.  She also asks if they would continue college if they were handed a degree today, and most students answered that they would remain in school.
Chapter Seven:
Chapter seven was a reflection of the lessons that Nathan had learned during her time undercover.   The most important lesson that she learned was compassion for the students who she had been teaching and never took the chance to know.  She talked about her ideas on improving her teaching style to accommodate student life when she returns to her teaching position.  She also confesses the times that she revealed herself as a professor while working in the field when it was absolutely necessary.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Overview Graphic Organizer Sam S.


The College Experience
Students, when first experiencing the world of college life, are often taken back by all the change and adjustment they now need to incorporate into their busy lives.  When imagining the ideal college experience, one often imagines a balanced scene; for example, balancing academics, activities, socialization, culture, diversity, and fun!  In Rebekah Nathan’s book My Freshman Year she encounters a number of categories college freshman are exposed to, listed above in the graphic organizer.  These categories above sum up all the experiences Nathan was exposed to in her year as a college freshman. 

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

Overview Vocab Builder Derek N.

Hossler, Schmit, and Nigel Vesper. "Going to College: How Social, Economic, and Educational Factors Influence the Decisions Students Make." J.H. University Press. John Hopkins University Press, 1999. Web. 3 May 2011.

Ostentatiously(Pg. 2)- Characterized by or given to pretentious or conspicuous show in an attempt to impress others.
Inextricably(Pg. 3)- Incapable of being disentangled, undone, loosed, or solved
Myriad(Pg. 4)- A very great or indefinitely great number of persons or things.
Methodological(Pg. 6)- A set or system of methods, principles, and rules for regulating a given discipline, as in the arts or sciences.
Mantra(Pg. 6)- A word or formula, as from the Veda, chanted or sung as an incantation or prayer.
Perspicacious(Pg. 6)- Having keen mental perception and understanding.
Lucent(Pg. 6)- Shining, translucent, glowing with light.
Repugnant(Pg. 7) - Distasteful, objectionable, or offensive: a repugnant smell.
Obstreperous(Pg 8)- Resisting control or restraint in a difficult manner.
Enervated(Pg. 8)- Deprived of vigor, force or strength.

Overview of My Freshman Year

                                    

Monday, May 9, 2011

Unhooked Graphic Organizer Liz Diede



Laura Sessions Stepp, in her book titled Unhooked, talks about the demographics of the culture she is analyzing: students at Duke University. Stepp explains that these students are “among America’s most gifted”, and with high SAT scores and excellent athletic ability, are “more team-oriented, achievement-driven, and polite than the college students of the 1960s and 1970s” (Stepp 20). She later analyzes the term ‘hooking up’, realizing that it holds a very broad range of meanings such and is used to give maximum freedom to the individual by not having an explicit meaning of the word. The influence of media on today’s young adults is astonishing. Shows such as The Bachelorette and Laguna Beach set a precedent for their young viewers who continue to mimic the actions of the characters on shows like these. This may lead to teens having sex earlier, since it is shown on TV as a normal and socially acceptable thing to do. The importance of parental figures in a child’s life is essential, Stepp argues, to the prolonging of sexual activity in an adolescent’s life. “Parents who plan down their kids’ early crushes may be worried that the crushes will lead to sex [. . .] but girls should not be denied the opportunity to have these crushes and talk about them” (Stepp 45). Parental involvement in the lives of their children is beneficial to the adolescents’ behavior pertaining to sex and drinking, claims Stepp.

Unhooked Vocab Sam S.

Morose (page 20)- gloomily or sullenly ill-humored, as a person or mood.
Cynicism (page 21)- cynical disposition, character, or belief.
Cloister (page 23)- a covered walk, especially in a religious institution, having an open arcade or colonnade usually opening onto a courtyard.
Credence (page 35)- belief as to the truth of something: to give credence to a claim.
Presiding (page 35)- to occupy the place of authority or control, as in an assembly or meeting; act as president or chairperson.
Subsequent (page 35)- occurring or coming later or after
Poignantly (page 38)- keenly distressing to the feelings
Nefarious (page 38)- extremely wicked or villainous; iniquitous
Discrepancies (page 39)- the state or quality of being discrepant; difference; inconsistency.
Elusive (page 42)- eluding clear perception or complete mental grasp; hard to express

Unhooked Discussion Leader Clare Koopmans

1.       Stepp classifies the phrase “hookup” as a broad term that can be applied to many different types of physical contact.  Some responses from college students on what the definition can mean are “a physical encounter of affection,” “third base and beyond,” and “immediate gratification” (21). As a college student, do you feel that this term is being represented properly in this article?

Yes, the term is being represented properly in this article because when a friend asks you what you did last night with the person who you took home from Higher Ground, the go-to answer is always “we hooked up.” It is a very broad term that encompasses many different sexual possibilities and lets a person know that you did more than just hold hands without giving dirty details.  It allows the questioning friend to let his or her mind wander to whatever scenario they want to envision, and it’s a way of avoiding details.

2.       “The girls made all the effort.  The guys didn’t have to do anything”(26).  Jamie, a senior at Duke University, said this about hooking up.  Do you agree with this statement that implies that boys don’t have to put forward any effort to hookup with a girl?
Yes and No.  In college from our experiences and what we have seen, a guy usually shows his interest in a girl by offering to dance with her, so he usually has to make the first move, which proves that guys do have to do some work.  A girl must then accept his offer to dance by dancing with him in return, and if the night goes well, it’s ultimately the girl’s decision on what happens at the end of the night.  After asking my friends in the dorm about this question, they agree that boys always go out looking for hookups and are usually always willing to be with a girl, it’s the girl’s decision to let that happen or not.

3.       “Students rarely go on formal dates but instead attend parties in large groups, followed by hook-ups—unplanned sexual encounters fueled by alcohol” (33). Is it true that all college students participate in these encounters and that all students rarely go on formal dates?  Do you think that Stepp does a good job of representing those people who choose not to participate in these sexual acts?
We know many people who are dating and find time to go on formal dates instead of going to bars and hooking up.  This article makes all college students look like they are sex-driven animals who don’t care about the feelings of others at all.  Although the purpose of the article is to show how the trends of sex have changed throughout the past decades, it would be appropriate to include how some students have preserved the formalities of courtship.

4.       “In essence, they [college girls] have analyzed the benefits and costs of relationships and come up with what they think is a bargain” (42).  What does this quote about college girls mean, and do you think that it’s an accurate conclusion?
This quote means that girls are ignoring romantic courtships and dating because they think that dating will take too much of their time away from schooling and careers.  They compromise this lack of a partner by hooking-up with random men in order to fill their sexual desires.  They skip the romance because they think that they won’t have time for a real relationship, and they have been told most of their lives that they don’t need to man to feel valuable.  A mistake from their parents, as pointed out in the article, is that they were never told as girls that it’s okay to feel valuable while in a relationship too.  Hooking up is a way for young women to fill their sexual desires, while staying independent.  This is an accurate conclusion, but we think that a lot of this activity stems from peer pressure and college culture exploited in the media.

Sunday, May 8, 2011

Unhooked Summarizer Derek N.

In Unhooked, by Laura Sessions Stepp, it is an in-depth view of the college world in terms of relationships. The book follows the idea of "hooking up" and analyzes many different forms of its definition, why people do it and its effects. It mainly covers hooking up from a girls perspective, and how they view/feel about this particular activity. Through interview the author gains a large amount of information, which she applies to her initial hypothesis of women pursue sex, delay love and lose at both. In an interview with Jamie, she finds that women who "hook up" feel it is "special" or more than just a one night stand compared to men.  With this, she emphasis on the fact the feelings are discouraged in "hooking up" and there is no commitment from either side. The author also tries to compare the similarities and differences of old generations "hooking up" and today's generation. The effects of "hooking up" are also covered throughout the book, mainly explaining how they are negative in terms of dating. They discourage dating and can even harm an individual in the long run when it comes to marriage. She shifts the topic of the book at one point to power, and how it has changed over the years. How now, men are seen as hunters and women are seen as prey, accounting for an equal amount of men and woman losing the virginities by the age of 16. The last point the author covered was how sexual imagery, cause by music, advertisements, television and everyday life, is a possible main cause for such acceptance of "hooking up."
-The author in the section of her book doesn't seem to come across as too biased. I do believe she blames men in a certain way for almost inventing "hooking up." The author uses many interviews and story's from college students, but almost all of them are women. I believe she should have focused a little more from the men's perspectives to get the full story. Although she is somewhat negative towards men in this section, in a way I agree with many of them things she states.

Unhooked by Laura Sessions Stepp


Friday, May 6, 2011

My Freshman Year: Journal 3


            Nathan’s final chapter of the book focuses on the lessons that she has learned while working in the field of college culture.  Her findings were not meant to be prescriptive advice for students and professors, but “rather as food for thought” on how to better the relationships between them (132).  We appreciate how Nathan chooses not to force her ideas and findings on us, but use them as mere suggestions.
            We find it interesting that Nathan’s main lesson learned in her sabbatical year was compassion after living as a professor among students.  If our professors at UW-Eau Claire spent time living in our dorms among students at our school, we feel the same result would occur.  Our professors would learn our way of life if they had to live our lifestyle, and they too might become passionate.  On the other hand, if we as students lived with a group of professors, we would pick up on their way of life and learn to respect it, too.
            We found it surprising that Nathan had not realized the racism on campus until she had spent her first afternoon in the cafeteria observing how students sit together when eating lunch.  We would think that a teacher who spends hours per weeks with her students would notice racism on campus, but this late observance showed how professors do not pay close attention the personal lives of their students. 
            A very realistic occurrence in this chapter to us in this chapter is when Nathan was studying with a close friend in the dorms for a French exam the next day.   Nathan remembered asking why they should study a certain portion of the course if it was not going to be on the exam, to which the other student replied, “Don’t you want to learn to speak French better?” (Nathan 142).  Nathan had previously hypothesized that it’s inappropriate for students to question the value of their education when learning in classes.  Nathan discovered that it is appropriate for close friends to give advice about not cutting corners in studying, and this experience surprised her.  We can relate to this experience because we are comfortable with speaking seriously about education with only our very close friends.
            In the Afterword, Nathan reflects further on why she chose to publish the book anonymously. She also admits to coming out as a professor three separate times while working in the fields.  Nathan’s reasoning for publishing anonymously is logical to us because she did not want to jeopardize the privacy of those students who she observed.  She was in disguise the entire time as a student, and by not telling her peers what her true intentions were, she was deceiving them.   As students living in the dorms, we would also feel tricked if an adult used our opinions and experiences that were shared in confidence as scholarly research without informing us.
             Nathan’s choice to only use direct quotes when she interviewed international students makes more sense to us now that we know she revealed herself as a professor to them before the interviews.   We previously thought that Nathan’s research only “scratched the surface,” but now after she has explained her position of privacy and why she can’t reveal very specific events in order to protect her students, we understand that she did indeed become a part of the culture.  
            The way in which Nathan chooses to end the book with an experience and confirm her reasons for publishing anonymously is an effective way to close her observations.  She ends with a quote from a student who found out her real academic identity outside of a classroom the year after her sabbatical work: “I can’t believe that…I feel fooled” (167).  Nathan’s choice to publish her book under a pen name is critical in regards to giving students the respect and confidentiality that they deserve.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Afterword Discusion Leader Derek N.

1. Why did Rabekah Nathan conduct this experiment? (What was the purpose)
We think she did this experiment simply to get a better understanding of students in a younger generation. This was also a generation that had developed its own culture, that little to no research from an "inside" perspective. Any other experiment done was from an anthropologists view, an outside look that would never have got such private and valid research.

2. Do you think Nathan Jeopardized  some of her research by disclosing her true identity to certain students?
No, only because she disclosed her true identity after the research, and to people who apparently did not destroy the experiment. We do however feel like the RA and a few select others may have treated her differently if they would have not known of her being a professor.
3. What do you think the biggest obstacle was for the author when going back to college?
We believed the hardest part of going back to college for her was fitting in and being social with the other freshman. With such a large age gap, this would be difficult for anyone to achieve, since the generation gap is completely different. We also thought changing to fit the culture of the college freshman seemed to almost intimidate her.
4.  Overall, do you think the author wrote this book in a biased sense towards students or professors?
In a sense yes, we thought she overshadowed certain students stories/events with her personal opinion. Since she is writing this for research and other anthropologists, it does little in analyzing the professors compared to the students. The only section that we felt was biased was when she discussed how other cultures look at U.S. students and our friendship customs.

Afterword Graphic Organizer Clare Koopmans


In the last section of the book, Nathan describes why she published the novel anonymously.  She explains that her feelings about documenting her experiences at the university changed dramatically from when she first entered the dorms and started hearing about college life to when she finally sat down after a year in the field to write the book.  She expresses fear that publishing the book with her name on it will upset those students who confided in her as a fellow student when talking about their social, academic, and personal lives.  Nathan explains that she only revealed herself as a professor in the dorms on three ocassions, and one of them was to the international students who allowed her to interview them.  The only direct quotes from students in the book are from those international students who knew her as a professor.  All other incidents and information about college life is paraphrased and not too specific in order to respect the students' privacy.

Afterword Summarizer Sam S.

Nathan’s “Afterword Ethics and Ethnography” was an after the fact story or a behind the scenes story.  What the audience didn’t know was that Nathan actually admitted to being an AnyU professor to three specific people during the course of her research. She felt it necessary to be honest if people asked but she also became more familiar with the “don’t ask don’t tell” policy.  Nathan knew she would be exposed to several encounters of cheating, drinking, and other illegal activities against university policy so she relinquished her role as an officer (faculty members are in some way an officer) by submitting letters to the university. She tells us that she would have preferred to put her real name on her work; however, in time she’s not terribly worried about the possibility that students will figure it out!

Afterword Vocabulary Builder Liz Diede


 1. Rapport (p. 159): relation; connection, especially harmonious or sympathetic relation.

2. Queries (p. 159): A question, an inquiry.

3. Relinquish (p. 160): To give up; put aside or desist from.

4. Mulling (p. 161): To study or ruminate; ponder.

5. Divulged (p. 162): To disclose or reveal (something private, secret, previously unknown)

6. Titularly (p. 162): Existing or being such in title only; nominal; having the title but none of the associated duties, powers, etc.

7. Privy (p. 165): Participating in the knowledge of something private or secret (usually followed by to).

8. Verbatim (p. 166): Corresponding word for word to the original source or text.

9. Voyeurism (p. 167): The practice of obtaining sexual gratification by looking at sexual objects or acts, especially secretively.

10. Pseudonym (p. 168): A fictitious name used by an author to conceal his or her identity; pen name.

Afterword: Ethics and Ethnography

Chapter 7 Summarizer Liz Diede


In chapter 7, Nathan addresses the things that she learned personally from her experience as a freshman at AnyU. She describes how most professors don’t know what a dorm room looks like, and do not know what the cost of housing, books, or tuition is at their university (Nathan 134). Nathan explains that it is easy for professors to see students are irresponsible for not coming in for help during office hours because they do not know what the typical schedule of a college undergraduate is like. Nathan describes a new understanding for college freshman, and as she enters her role as a professor once again, she even makes a few changes to her syllabus to accommodate for these needs. She understands that students are less likely to read articles that they wont be tested on, and she realizes that in the time between her two lectures, students may have four other classes to prepare for, while she only has one. This realization may increase the respect that she has for her students and also cause her to be less surprised when some students come to class without doing the assigned readings. One section of this chapter that was interesting to me was when Nathan addresses the subject of student finances. Nathan acknowledges that students today are poorer than students of the past (Nathan 150). She also states that since this is true, many students are forced to work and go to school at the same time, which decreases the amount of time for studying that each student has each week. This has a great impact on student grades and performance levels and is something that I think needs to be addressed in today’s society.
Nathan’s tone in chapter 7 is acceptance of the student culture that she once knew hardly anything about. Nathan expresses awareness that the role of student-teacher relationships is not as important as she once thought it was. She also explains that she wishes that students could understand the role of a professor (Nathan 145). She writes, “That their silence in class can make an enthusiastic professor lose his energy and a new teacher doubt her abilities; or that finding a student cheating is not a triumphant moment”. This paragraph was interesting to me, because in my opinion, a lot of students don’t realize the effect that their behavior in class has on the professor. Although Nathan has gained a lot of knowledge about the undergraduate culture, she still makes a valid point in saying that students do not understand what it is like to be a professor at a university. 

Chapter 7 Discussion Leader Sam S.

1)      Why did Nathan refer to her experience as “going back and forth between worlds?” (134)
·         Nathan obviously had to go to school to get her college teaching degree so she spent time at the University as a student, then she graduated and became a professor, then she went back to AnyU as a student a second time to gather information creating a “back and forth” affect.
·         She now fully understands what goes through a student’s head as they attend class when she went back to school as a student at AnyU.
·         She felt her experience to be a bit like a cross-cultural travel.
2)      What changes did Nathan make to her lectures and syllabus as a teacher?
·         She didn’t assign readings if they were not going to be used or important because she knew her students wouldn’t read them anyways.
·         She follows up her lectures with office hours to encourage students to attend.
·         She begins the lecture exactly on time to prevent students from being tardy.
3)      What questions did she find her students asking when they wanted to know if they should actually read the material? (138)
·         “Will there be a test or quiz on this material?”
·         “Is the reading something that I will need in order to be able to do the homework?”
·         “Will we directly discuss this in class in such a way that I am likely to have to personally and publicly respond or otherwise perform in relation to this reading?”
4)      What helped make Nathans faculty-administrative-student circle complete?
·         She was a “faculty fellow” (148) in AnyU’s Office of the President giving her special access to planning and policy meetings.
·         She’s seen the university as a graduate and as an undergraduate teacher
·         She served multiple terms on their faculty senate.
·         She took the opportunity to become a student again at AnyU.

Sunday, May 1, 2011

Chapter 7 Vocabulary Builder Clare Koopmans

1. Demeanor....conduct; behavior; deportment.
2. Tacit.............understood without being openly expressed; implied: tacit approval.
3. Inkling...........a slight suggestion or indication; hint; intimation 
4. Quixotic.........extravagantly chivalrous or romantic; visionary, impractical, or impracticable
5. Superficially...being at, on, or near the surface
6. Poignant........affecting or moving the emotions
7. Cynical..........showing contempt for accepted standards of honesty or morality by one's actions, especially by actions that exploit the scruples of others
8. Vigilant..........keenly watchful to detect danger; wary
9. Malaise.........a vague or unfocused feeling of mental uneasiness, lethargy, or discomfort
10. Parlance......a way or manner of speaking; vernacular

Chapter 7 Graphic Organizer Derek N.



Chapter 7 is a reflection of Rebekah Nathan's overall experience as a professor living among students. I chose these four main points in relationship to what she learned from this experience. In student as a teacher, she realizes how and why students choose to do class work by means of importance. In teacher as a student, she explains how professors and students know little of each other's schedules and daily lives on campus. In differences in culture, she looks at it from an archeologists view. She reflects on how culture has affected the way students in American build their morals and beliefs. Nathan also recaps on the differences in culture with American students, and the views other nations perceive our colleges. The overall reflection of the author is that if teachers and students can understand the learning habits and schedules of one another, they can help a university prosper for future students.

Chapter 7 Graphic Organizer

Chapter 7 Lessons from My Year as a Freshman